Reena Kumari v. State Of Haryana And Another

CWP-27558-2025 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.107 CWP-27558-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 Reena Kumari .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

Present:

Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate, and Ms. Navjeet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking regularisation of the petitioner in service, who is working as Embroidery Instructor in the respondent Department.

2.

Learned counsel contended that in terms of the latest decision of the Supreme Court, dated 16.04.2026, rendered in Madan Singh and others v. State of Haryana and others, 2026 INSC 379, the petitioner is entitled to regularisation under the Government notification dated 18.06.2014, Annexure P-8. At this stage, she will be satisfied in case she is permitted to make an appropriate representation before the respondents raising the said grievance, which may be ordered to be decided within a specified period. All relevant particulars of the petitioner's service which entitle her to the claimed benefit will be mentioned therein.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Learned State counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents, and submits that in case any such representation is filed by the MANINDER 2026.05.27 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment petitioner within four weeks from today, the same will be decided by

CWP-27558-2025 (O&M) 2 respondent no.2 - Director, Department of Skill Development and Industrial Training, by passing a speaking order thereupon in accordance with law in the light of Madan Singh case ibid., within six months of receiving the representation.

5.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6.

Ordered accordingly.

7.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of `50,000 to the petitioner. 8.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 25.05.2026 Maninder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MANINDER 2026.05.27 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment