Satyawan v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-58179-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:151791

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-58179-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:28.11.2023.

Satyawan

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. AG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (Oral) FIR No Dated Police Station` Sections 01.03.2022 Badhra, District Charkhi Dadri 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC (7 and 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 added during investigation against coaccused Mukesh and not against the petitioner.

1.

The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above, had come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.

2.

Vide order dated 20.11.2023,
  

 




  
   

  
 

 3.

The petitioner's counsel argued that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner has voluntarily complied with all the conditions of the bail order and joined the investigation. He further submits that embezzelment is Rs.3,20,000/- and said amount has already been PRIYANKA 2023.12.02 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-58179-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:151791 returned by the petitioner.

4.

The State's counsel opposes the bail, however, while making reference Para No.9 of the reply admits that amount in question has already been deposited in the State head.

5.

Given above, the present petition stand allowed and interim order dated 20.11.2023 is made absolute. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 28.11.2023 pry Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

PRIYANKA 2023.12.02 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document