Rajbir Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRWP No. 10557 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP No. 10557 of 2024 Date of Decision: 29.10.2024 Rajbir Singh and others ...PeƟƟoners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Naresh Chander, Advocate for the peƟƟoners.

Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

1.

Seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for protecƟng the life and liberty of the peƟƟoners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7, the peƟƟoners have come up before this Court under ArƟcle 226/227 of ConsƟtuƟon of India. 2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that the police officers are conƟnuously raiding the house of the peƟƟoners at the instance of respondent No.7. 3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

Since the allegaƟons of harassment are at the hands of police, therefore, no protecƟon is required to be given. Concerned SSP/SHO to ensure that the peƟƟoners are not harassed.

5.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoners and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.29 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRWP No. 10557 of 2024 6.

PeƟƟon is partly allowed with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 29.10.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.29 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh