Gurmeet Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-29964-2024 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-29964-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.11.2024 Gurmeet Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

Mr. Sumeet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Upasana Dhawan, AAG, Haryana.

*** HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing respondent No.2- Superintending Canal Officer, Hissar to decide the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner against the draft scheme dated 25.01.2024 (Annexure P-4).

2.

On advance service of copy of petition, Ms. Upasana Dhawan, AAG, Haryana, appears on behalf of the respondent-State. 3.

Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Rakesh Kumar, SDO, submits that the learned Superintending Canal Officer, Hissar- respondent No.2, who is seized of the appeal filed by the petitioner, shall consider and decide the appeal within a period of four months from HIMANI GUPTA 2024.11.07 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

CWP-29964-2024 (O&M) -2today.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by learned State counsel, submits that he does not intend to press the instant writ petition any further. 5.

Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 6.

All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 06.11.2024 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2024.11.07 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh