← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/61022/2022allowed

Raj Kumar And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023-05-11Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta2 pages

CRM-M-61022-2022 2023:PHHC:068441

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.247 CRM-M-61022-2022 Date of Decision: 11.05.2023 RAJ KUMAR AND ANR .... Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. P. K. Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate for Mr. Hitender Kansal, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of F.I.R.

No.338 dated 10.10.2022 registered under Sections 120-B/419/420/467/468/471, at Police Station Sector -14, Gurugram and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).

This Court vide order dated 07.02.2023 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated MAMTA 2023.05.17 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-61022-2022 2023:PHHC:068441 24.03.2023 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and F.I.R. No.338 dated 10.10.2022 registered under Sections 120-B/419/420/467/468/471, at Police Station Sector -14, Gurugram and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2), are quashed.

(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE 11.05.2023 M.Sikka Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MAMTA 2023.05.17 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment