Urmila v. Bajrang
!"# $%&%!'( )* *
+ *** ,-.
***. ( /+*..
. * + !
" # $%%%"& ' ( ) '*
+ %, -%-- -
. -/ %- -% + 0 ! 1
-$* * ! . ' ' . ( ) ' *
+ %, -%--# $%%%"& & ' * ' !
3 ' ' ) '*
' 4 '5
'# 2%%%%"&
# -%%%%"&
'
' '
'
) '* $
7
. '
! .* 9
-$ * * '
. -$* *
$:2;' 2, * 7
+
&( 1<
*
! ( )
! " !!
! # $ &( 1<
*
!" # $ $ ! ( )=>
% # ! # ! ! #
#
!
!# #
!# $ /
'
" "
,
. ' ' ! ' ? .
' * 9
9 .9
? '? '
.9 ' ''!
%
4 & ( 1<
* %" &
'
&
&
( $ 9
)* +
, '
"# () * #
# & #+, "- *!
--.
"!
,
)
! ! # ! .!
/0/1 !
%- 23# !
! # #
/ # # ! # 4 - 23!
4 5 23 / 4! # 4 / 0
*
1 ,
+ 0 + 6 &7" """"" !
!
.!/0/1 !
!
2,
.
&
2!!
,
. 4 !
8 ("""
,
#& !&! /#! !
&,& ,
/
%8# #
()"*
3
, 435 ,!
,
./& ! :+;1 + <95 '293 0 * +5 : !
! ! !
: 9' # =>>"
?
' ( ) '* !* ' # $%%%"& ! ' &
# -%%%"& 3earned Court below has duly considered the material placed before it for determining the quantum of maintenance. A careful and just balance has been drawn, keeping in view the spiralling inflation rates and high cost of living corresponding to the reasonable needs of the petitioner. 3 '' ' * ' '
.
)* *
+!@# :;
4!" @"A :;
4 @"A