← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-A/951/2018allowed

Anil Kumar And ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS.

2025-12-19Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara1 pages

CRM-A-951-MA-2018 (O&M) ANIL KUMAR AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA

Present:

Mr. Himanshu Garg, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Atul Gaur, A.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Sandeep Vashisth, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.

*** CRM-16877-2018 For the reasons menƟoned in the applicaƟon, delay of 19 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

ApplicaƟon stands allowed.

CRM-A-951-MA-2018 Counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for convicƟon of respondents No.2 to 4. There is no appreciaƟon of evidence in judgment of acquiƩal dated 28.11.2017.

Counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 opposes the prayer. Leave to appeal granted.

Main case Heard AdmiƩed.

The accused i.e. respondents No.2 to 4 to execute a bond for aƩendance within three months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. Given above, the accused-respondents No.2 to 4 shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty-Five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the saƟsfacƟon of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepƟng the sureƟes, the concerned Court must saƟsfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the peƟƟoner before the Court.

The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all sƟpulaƟons, terms, and condiƟons of this bail order. Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondents No.2 to 4 to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and aƩest it to be a true copy. In case the aƩesƟng officer wants to verify the authenƟcity, such an officer can also verify its authenƟcity and may download and use the downloaded copy for aƩesƟng bonds. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 19.12.2025 JyoƟ Sharma JYOTI SHARMA 2025.12.19 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh