Nisha v. Baksho And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

ESA-39-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.11.2019 Nisha ..... Appellant

Versus

Baksho and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the appellant.

Mr. RD Rattewal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 is taken on record. Be tagged at the appropriate place.

Despite the case having been called twice, the appellant has gone un-represented.

Perusal of file shows that on the last three dates also i.e. 30.07.2018, 01.02.2019 and 31.07.2019, none had appeared on behalf of appellant. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the appellant or her counsel is not interested in pursuing the instant appeal. More so, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 by producing copy of order dated 15.10.2018, duly attested by him submits that the instant appeal has rendered infructuous, in view of final disposal of execution against the appellant.

In view of the above, instant appeal is dismissed on following two counts:- (i) as having been rendered infructuous; and (ii) for want of prosecution as well.

November 29, 2019 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2019.12.09 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document