← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/59617/2023disposed of

Surinder Kumar v. State Of Punjab

2024-09-20Mr. Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu2 pages

CRM-M-59617-2023 216-1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-59617-2023 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.09.2024 Surinder Kumar

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU

Present:

Mr. Mayur Karkra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajaib Singh, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J.

Present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail pending trial to the petitioner in FIR No.58 dated 24.04.2023, under Sections 22 & 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; and Sections 419 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station City-I, Malerkotla, District Malerkotla, Punjab. 2.

Allegations are that 2,70,000 intoxicating tablets (make Tramadol Hydrochloride 100 mg Tablets Toridol SR), were recovered from co-accused, namely, Mohd. Tahir, Umardin & Mohd. Sehbaz. Petitioner has been nominated as an accused in the present case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused Mohd. Tahir. 3.

After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer, learned counsel for the petitioner, on ATUL SETHI 2024.09.25 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -1-

CRM-M-59617-2023 instructions, does not press the petition at this stage and submits that same be disposed off, as such.

4.

Ordered accordingly.

5.

Above observations be not construed as an expression of opinion on merits of case, in any manner.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 20.09.2024 (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) atulsethi JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No ATUL SETHI 2024.09.25 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2-