Sumit Gupta And ORS v. Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.36044 of 2019 Date of decision: 12.12.2019 Sumit Gupta and others ..Petitioners

Versus

Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Vijay K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioners.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in spite of making various representations, legal notices and thereafter reminders, still respondent-authorities have not made necessary correction relating to status of Industrial Plot No.146 in Phase-II, Industrial Area, Panchkula on the website of HUDA/HSVP. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case, directions are issued to consider the representations and the legal notice pending since long. Notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, notices on behalf of respondents-State have been accepted by Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, DAG, Haryana. Copy of the writ petition be supplied to learned State counsel during course of the day.

By considering the limited prayer of the petitioners and without saying anything on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is NEETU RANI 2019.12.13 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.36044 of 2019 ......

disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to take action on the pending legal notice dated 07.11.2019 (Annexure P-14) in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 12.12.2019 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2019.12.13 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh