← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/10596/2024disposed of

Ramesh Kumar And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2024-10-30Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda2 pages

CRWP-10596-2024 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10596-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.10.2024 Ramesh Kumar and another

...Petitioners

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Present:

Mr. Amandeep Singh Punia, Advocate for for the petitioners.

*** DEEPAK MANCHANDA , J.(Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents No. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the private respondents No.4 to 6.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are major. In support thereof, copies of Aadhar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2. Learned counsel further submits that representation of the petitioners dated 29.10.2024 (Annexure P-5) has already been submitted before respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Kurukshetra which has not been taken into consideration till date.

3.

                           

 

  !   " #

$      " !      VANITA 2024.10.30 01:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order and judgment

CRWP-10596-2024  4.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition be treated as representation and the same be ordered to be decided within a time bound manner by looking into the grievance of the petitioners.

5.

Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. 6.

At this stage, Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl.A.G.Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and submits that the representation dated 29.10.2024 (Annexure P-5) has not been decided by the authorities till date.

7.

Therefore, without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, the petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Kurukshetra to look into the grievance of the petitioners as set out in the petition and the same be treated as representation and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances in accordance with law.

7.

Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 30.10.2024 vanita Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No VANITA 2024.10.30 01:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order and judgment