Kusum v. State Of Haryana And Otehrs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28657-2025 Date of Decision :28.10.2025 Kusum

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had undertaken to implead the concerned Department, which is a necessary party, but it has not been done. Besides, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file it afresh by impleading the concerned Department as necessary party, if so advised.

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) October 28, 2025 JUDGE ps Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.10.29 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document