Rahul Garg v. Kurukshetra University And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-36072-2019 Date of Decision: 19.12.2024 Rahul Garg

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Ms. Sunaina, Advocate for Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2 TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) On 13.11.2024, learned counsel for respondents no.1 and 2 had submitted that the matter has been rendered infructuous on account of supersession of impugned notification, dated 01.12.2016, by a subsequent notification dated 25.02.2021.

2.

The said fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

In view thereof, the petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 19.12.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.12.20 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document