Gurpreet Singh v. State Of Punjab

On 22.09.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "The present petition ha of BNSS, 2023 for the gra petitioner in case registered dated 21.06.2025 under S 190, 191(3) BNS and Secti 1959 (later on added Secti BNS) at Police Station R (Rural).

as been filed under Section 482 ant of anticipatory bail to the d against him vide FIR No.95 Sections 127(2), 115(2), 125, ion 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, ions 109 & Section 324(4) of Raja Sansi, District Amritsar The learned counsel contends that the petitioner spot and is said to be a co injury has been attributed to for the petitioner inter alia r has not been identified at the onspirator. Even otherwise, no o any accused.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Sin the Court, accepts notice on ngh, AAG, Punjab, present in n behalf of the State.

Adjourned to 20.11.2025 In the meantime, the p before the SHO/Investigatin and in the event of his arre on his furnishing bail b SHO/Investigating Agency conditions as envisaged und 5.

etitioner is directed to appear ng Officer to join investigation est, he shall be released on bail bonds to the satisfaction of y, subject to the following der Section 482(2) BNSS:- PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.11 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation before the investigating officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court and shall surrender his passport, if any.

Meanwhile, the State is directed to file an affidavit/reply as to the exact role of the petitioner and his co-accused alongwith the details of pending FIRs, if any, on or before the next date of hearing."

2.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

3.

Learned State counsel on instructions from Inspector Bagel Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 4.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 22.09.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

5.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.11 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.