Jagdish Mohan Kallan And ORS v. Rajneesh Karnatak

024 (O&M) COCP No.4288 of 20 IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA ARH AT CHANDIGA JAGDISH MO Vs RAJNEESH KA COCP No Date of D o.4288 of 2024 (O&M) Decision: 03.12.2024 HAN KALLAN AND ORS ......Petitioners ....Respondent ARNATAK CORAM: HON

Present:

Mr for Mr for HARKESH MA N'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKES SH MANUJA . Chandra Sekhar, Advocate the petitioners.

. Gaurav Goel, Advocate the respondent (through video-c conferencing).

**** ANUJA, J. (Oral) 1.

Com mpliance affidavit of Sh. Hasib bur Rahman, Chief Manager, Ba ank of India, FGMO O Office at Chandigarh on behalf f of the respondent, already filed d in the Registry is ta aken on record.

2.

In t terms of the aforementioned com mpliance affidavit, learned coun nsel for the petitioner rs does not press the present peti ition.

3.

Dis smissed as not pressed.

4.

Rul le stands discharged.

December 03, 2 Atik (HA ARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Wh Wh hether speaking/reasoned Yes hether reportable Yes s/No s/No MOHMED ATIK 2024.12.04 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment