Sharda Devi v. Ramesh Kumar
!
"#$% & '& ( #$#)$* "#$% & '& ( +,- "- !./ ,- !.
&&& 0.0.#$
1 & -2 ,3)2- &&& 4#$"
$0 % 56 &+ +
+ 7&6 8
!
"#$ % & '(
*
+
, - .
!
!
.
*
/
+
, 0 0 +
$
)
!)
2 3 3#
4 ) 5!
* 5
.
2 . .
6 23337, ! . .
! ) . ! 8
*
)
. / .
!0 9. ! !
.
2 / 6 23337, !
*
!
:
5!
*
2 3 3# )
. 6 23337, !
))
!
! ! :
! .
5!
*
!)
!
! .
./
0 ; </ =
) * 6 >2>337, !
> 9
)!
# 0
)
)* ! )
! ! 0
! /
)
. ?
) . )
2
.
*
0 .!
!
2 .
! 0
.!
. .
2%$(
$"
-
,4 ) < 9'
!
/ ) 4 5 <
.
! " !!
! # $ "
5 .,4 ) < 9'
!
(
! "
# # / ) 4 5 8 @
.
% # ! # ! ! #
#
!!# # ! # $ 3
0 ) )
) !) ! !
7 7 ! )
1
) * ! *
! !/
!
* ! + ! ! *
?!
9 .
0
! ? ?!
! 0
. +! * +) .
* ?* .
!
* /
! A
& . 4 ) 9'
!
$!
% & %
%
'
( #
.
!
?!
.
') *
+
( "# ) *+ #
# & #,- ".
)
,
--.
!
+
! ! # ! /!
01 02 !
%.
34# !
8
! # #
0 # # ! # 5
.
34!
5 6 34 0 5 ! # 5 / 0
)
1 +
, 1 , 7 &8" """"" !
!
/!0102 ! !
3+
.
%
2
+
/ 5 !
9 )"""
-
#& !&! 0#! !
%+% +
/
%9# #
' )*"+
3
+ 435 +
+
:
/0& ! ;,<2 , =:6
(3:41 + ,6 ; !
! ! ! ; :( # >??"
'
13.
A perusal of the impugned order passed by learned Family Court makes it evident that the Court below has duly considered the material placed before it for determining the quantum of maintenance. It transpires that an amount of Rs.4,000/- per month was granted as interim maintenance to the petitioner-wife vide order dated 20.09.2007 while taking into account her children who were minor at that time. It was contended by the respondent-husband that since then the children have attained the age of majority and started earning and that her bank account showed regular income. Taking into account all the aforesaid facts, a careful and just balance has been drawn by the learned Court below by keeping in view the spiralling inflation rates and high cost of living corresponding to the reasonable needs of the petitioner. The maintenance amount of Rs.4,000/- per month which was earlier awarded to the petitioner wife has been increased by almost 4 times to Rs.15,000/- per month. In the considered opinion of this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner has been unable to indicate any perversity
in the impugned order which warrants interference by this Court. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed being bereft of any merit. 14.
All the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
:+ ;
$ 3# 3
A / )7 B7; A
B7;