Puneet v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55582-2024 Date of decision: 10.03.2025 PUNEET ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Pe11on for Regular Bail under Sec1on 483 BNSS FIR No.

Dated Police Staon Secons 10.11.2023 Chhapar, District Yamuna Nagar 304, 328 of IPC and Secon 72-A of Excise Act (Secons 302, 307, 120-B, 201 of IPC added later on) 2.

The peoner seeking regular bail in the FIR caponed above had come up before this Court under Secon 483 of Bharaya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS). 3.

Learned counsel for the peoner submits that the peoner has been discharged, consequently, the present peon has been rendered infructuous and he wants to withdraw the present peon.

4.

Disposed of as having been withdrawn. All the pending applicaon(s), if any, stand disposed of.

10.03.2025 ( ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.03.12 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document