Mamta Devi v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No. 53596 of 2019 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 53596 of 2019 Date of Decision: 19.12.2019 Mamta Devi ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Mohan, DAG, Haryana.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 216 dated 2.7.2019 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 302, 303, 506, 452, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Naraingarh, District Ambala.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 8.7.2019 and neither any role nor any injury has been attributed to her. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case due to old enmity and being mother of Mohit son of Nasib, who is one of the accused in the present FIR. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Gurmukh, submits that five accused have been arrested and the rest are still at large. The petitioner is in custody since 8.7.2019. She has not been attributed any role or injury. The trial will take time to conclude. No useful GURPREET SINGH 2019.12.19 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars.

CRM-M No. 53596 of 2019 -2Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE December 19, 2019 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2019.12.19 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh