Mahinder v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-30083-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-30083-2024 Date of decision: 07.11.2024 Mahinder

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. Nihal S. Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel would submit that regarding the claim raised in the present petition, a legal notice dated 25.09.2024 (Annexure P-7) has been served upon the respondents by relying on the judgments passed by this Court in Harbans Lal vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP-2371-2010, decided on 31.08.2010 and Joginder Singh vs. State of Haryana, 1998(1) S.C.T. 795, which has yet not evoked any response. He thus, at this stage, on instructions, prays that a direction be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

At the asking of the Court, Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and has no objection to the limited prayer made.

4.

 



 

  

  

 

     

   

 

 

    

 25.09.2024

    

    

  

, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. HAMANT 2024.11.08 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-30083-2024 Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.    (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 07.11.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No HAMANT 2024.11.08 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document