Krishan Kumar v. Sh. Vinay Kumar And Another

024 (O&M) COCP No.4318 of 20 IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA ARH AT CHANDIGA KRISHAN KU Vs SH. VINAY KU COCP No Date of D o.4318 of 2024 (O&M) Decision: 11.12.2024 UMAR ......Petitioner ....Respondents UMAR AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON

Present:

Mr for Mr HARKESH MA N'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKES SH MANUJA . T.S. Dhull, Advocate the petitioner.

. Amit Aggarwal, D.A.G., Harya ana.

**** ANUJA, J. (Oral) 1.

Lea arned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the or rder passed by the W Writ Court, appointment letter has been issued in favour of the petitioner, theref fore, he does not press the presen nt petition.

2.

Dis smissed as not pressed.

3.

Rul le stands discharged.

December 11, 2 Atik (HA ARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Wh Wh hether speaking/reasoned Yes hether reportable Yes s/No s/No MOHMED ATIK 2024.12.12 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment