← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/20661/2018allowed

Paramjit Kaur v. State Of Punjab Through Principal Secretary And Orss

2023-03-10Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain17 pages

 

      "%& #&'( ) 





 

          )  *+  , - 

   !   

 Mr. Sehajbir S. Aulakh, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Jagdeep Rana, Advocate for the respondents-PSPCL.

-.

"       # !

    #!

$    !  ! 

%&'(& 

  # $!

 !)

 * ! # !

   ##+ ,!   %&'(  %! -& 

  # $!

 !)  $  "  +



 #

!#./0 1



2 ) $ !+

 

!

 3 $ 4) 5+)

!#  

% $! 

 !

 

 ) !+

    !

  +! 

 

(#!  

!!    )# $# $!      

  #)# )#   $     $ $ 6.67..6+ #  )    8 !       +          8 1

!# ! 

  +!!

$# $!     9'

  +1

:

;+  !#    !

  4) 5<&'= %3  ( " !

  

!  !

   !  $> $ ++% $8 ! +

  81

 ! !

  ;+  + ,%,  !

$?     $ $ 6.6'..6+  $  )#$+

 

 $

# $% 2 !#    + % $$ $+  $+  +##$+ 

 $



 !) $8#$+

% +  

)+  $+#) $ $+      !%+ $ #   $      +!!

 + !

+ !  +@) A,,9. .

4 6+ #$     

 $B$ $+

# !

 $ ,  !

$"

 

  % $! 



     #)     $  +    !!    $# $!     '1

;+  1

   

  

    )    

   "  

  +

   !         #$#  

!       

  #1896C.. 1 + 1  !

  '1

 '

@  +1

:

 

#   !

 #%    

 !  #'! #$# 

! (.<&'0= )

 !

   #)  ) $ 

   !

#) !!!+

#+#% +

 $   1   ;)   (<C=1<1

#=C6  !

 )

!    6.: 

 %  !

+

  +      !  !

 !) A

 C ,

) 1

 

##      

+$ !     % !     !

 1 )+)1?19(0D00 + !+   D ,!  0 ##+   '

@: !#

   ##! # +

 #  )! #   & +% 2 +    !

 !) 2! !!

!!  

 

 % !     !

 !

& #)! ## + !+#!

  #)  !<= ##)/'! # !A 6  +     1

           4) 5#) $  -- $#       $             #!

!

    !  #!

!

 # !   

  $  ! 

      $# $!  !    

      1

 . :1# 

 

!  ! !  ! E) E

  * !  !

!       #!

 !  !%  !!     ! !)  # !  $#!"& B% * !  !

"& !#$) )  

 

/    #     $     )  &  1    0&'%1'%2"1#3(,4"0-56"1.

783051%"(&($/



 '1

 $$# $ # #  )! 

 0 !  1#  

  !    $# 

    -&!

-$  1:

9  $+

   !#        !

    % $    +    /! $ )! #  +

 , 

  ,    #  !

  5 2 !# 

 $ $ ! ! 9.

In order to ascertain the extent of caution casted upon the respondent Corporation-licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003 it will be apt to peruse the relevant provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, which read as under :- "Section 68. (Provisions relating to Overhead lines): (1) An overhead line shall, with prior approval of the Appropriate Government, be installed or kept installed above ground in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2).

2. The provisions contained in sub-section (1) shall not apply - (a) in relation to an electric line which has a nominal voltage not exceeding 11 kilovolts and is used or intended to be used for supplying to a single

 consumer;

(b) in relation to so much of an electric line as is or will be within premises in the occupation or control of the person responsible for its installation; or (c) in such other cases as may be prescribed.

(3) The Appropriate Government shall, while granting approval under sub-section (1), impose such conditions (including conditions as to the ownership and operation of the line) as appear to it to be necessary

(4) The Appropriate Government may vary or revoke the approval at any time after the end of such period as may be stipulated in the approval granted by it.

(5) Where any tree standing or lying near an overhead line or where any structure or other object which has been placed or has fallen near an overhead line subsequent to the placing of such line, interrupts or interferes with, or is likely to interrupt or interfere with, the conveyance or transmission of electricity or the to interrupt or interfere with, the conveyance or transmission of electricity or the accessibility of any works, an Executive Magistrate or authority specified by the Appropriate Government may, on the application of the licensee, cause the tree, structure or object to be removed or otherwise dealt with as he or it thinks fit.

(6) When disposing of an application under sub-section (5), an Executive Magistrate or authority specified under that subsection shall, in the case of any tree in existence before the placing of the overhead line, award to the person interested in the tree such compensation as he thinks reasonable, and such person may recover the same from the licensee.

9 Explanation. - For purposes of this section, the expression "tree" shall be deemed to include any shrub, hedge, jungle growth or other plant."

10.

Electricity Rules, 1956 have been enacted under Section 37 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 to lay down the procedure of safety and protective devices qua overhead electricity lines passing over part of any street, public place or any consumer's premises. Rules 29, 44, 45, 46 and 91 thereof read as under :- "29. Construction, installation, protection, operation and maintenance of electric supply lines and apparatus. - (1) All electric supply lines and apparatus shall be of sufficient ratings for power, insulation and estimated fault current and of sufficient mechanical strength, for the duty which they may be required to perform under the environmental conditions of installation, and shall be constructed, installed, protected, worked and maintained in such a manner as to ensure safety of [human beings, animals and property].

(2) Save as otherwise provided in these rules, the relevant code of practice of the [Bureau of Indian Standards] [including National Electrical Code] if any may be followed to carry out the purposes of this rule and in the event of any inconsistency, the provision of these rules shall prevail.

(3) The material and apparatus used shall conform to the relevant specifications of the [Bureau of Indian Standards] where such specifications have already been laid down."

xxx xxx xxx

44. Instructions for restoration of persons suffering from

$ electric shock. - (1) Instructions, in English or Hindi and the local language of the district and where Hindi is the local language, in English and Hindi for the restoration of persons suffering from electric shock, shall be affixed by the owner in a conspicuous place in every generating station, enclosed substation, enclosed switch-station and in every factory as defined in clause (m) of Section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948) in which electricity is used and in such other premises where electricity is used as the Inspector or any officer appointed to assist the Inspector may, by notice in writing served on the owner, direct.

(2) Copies of the instructions shall be supplied on demand by an officer or officers appointed by the Central or the State Government in this behalf at a price to be fixed by the Central or the State Government.

(3) The owner of every generating station, enclosed substation, enclosed switch-station and every factory or other premises to which this rule applies, shall ensure that all authorised persons employed by him are acquainted with and are competent to apply the instructions referred to in sub-rule (1). (4) In every manner high voltage or extra-high voltage generating station, sub station or switch station, an artificial respirator shall be provided and kept in good working condition.

45. Precautions to be adopted by consumers, [owners, occupiers], electrical, contractors, electrical workmen and suppliers - (1) No electrical installation work, including additions, alterations, repairs and adjustments to existing installations, except such replacement of lamps, fans, fuses, switches, low voltage domestic appliances and fittings as in no way alters its capacity or character, shall be carried out upon the premises of or on behalf of any [consumer, supplier, owner or occupier] for the purpose of supply to such [consumer, supplier,

:

owner or occupier] except by an electrical contractor licensed in this behalf by the State Government and under the direct supervision of a person holding a certificate of competency and by a person holding a permit issued or recognised by the State Government :

Provided that in the case of works executed for or on behalf of the Central Government and in the case of installations in mines, oil fields and railways, the Central Government and in other cases the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, exempt, on such conditions as it may impose, any such work described therein either generally or in the case of any specific class of [consumers, suppliers, owners or occupiers] from so much of this sub-rule as requires such work to be carried out by an electrical contract licensed by the State Government in this behalf.

(2) No electrical installation work which has been carried out in contravention of sub-rule (1) shall either be energised or connected to the works of any supplier.] xxxxxx

46. Periodical inspection and testing of installation, - (1)(a) Where an installation is already connected to the supply system of the supplier, every such installation shall be periodically inspected and tested at intervals not exceeding five years either by the Inspector (or any officer appointed to assist the Inspector) or by the supplier as may be directed by the State Government in this behalf or in the case of installation belonging to, or under the control of the Central Government, and in the case of installations in mines, oil fields and railways by the Central Government.

(aa) the periodical inspection and testing of high voltage and extra high voltage installations #$ #  ###



  !        #    &! $     )  ) 

!

) !     !

F <= 8 #   !

) 1 #   >        !  )      !

   

 ##

##  !

   ##

 

! !!   ) 2!

 ##

!)!  2!

 )  !    2!

   '#<= #C <!=  !

  # 2!

  

!

 !  &2G' ) +

! 

 !

!  !!!3  

 '# <=<= "! !

  ##   ) 1 #  >  

 ! ) 

!!!#! ##)#) !   ! <= 2     #)!  )    !

  '

! #) 

 ##

!! ### #  !!

      !

      2!

  !   !!



+  ##  ) # +

 $

 !  !#)E

! +

$   

   <!= 2     # +)  ##



  !

)    !

        ##

        )  2!

)) !        '#<=#C    &2G +



  !    !  ##

## # #  !!

H  !

 2!

F   +!  ##

+



!

     ##

##  !!

 ! #  #. ##  

) )  !!

    

  !  

!##  # C5 )!  #  $!  !### ) !

 # !

#CD <(= 9 +

    # !  ## ##

##) #    !

 ##

 !!

  $I "91. Safety and protective devices :- (1) Every overhead line, (not being suspended from a dead bearer wire and not being covered with insulating material and not being a trolley-wire) erected over any part of street or other public place or in any factory or mine or on any consumers' premises shall be protected with a device approved by the Inspector for rendering the line electrically harmless in case it breaks.

(2) An Inspector may by notice in writing require the owner of any such overhead line wherever it may be erected to protect it in the manner specified in sub-rule (I).

(3) The owner of every high and extra-high voltage overhead line shall make adequate arrangements to the satisfaction of the Inspector to prevent unauthorised persons from ascending any of the supports of such overhead lines which can be easily climbed upon without the help of a ladder or special appliances. Rails, reinforced cement concrete poles and pre-stressed cement concrete poles without steps, tubular poles, wooden supports without steps, I-sections and channels shall be deemed as supports which cannot be easily climbed upon for the purpose of this rule]."

(emphasis supplied)

 11.

I may hastenly add here that even though 1910 Act stands repealed by 2003 Act but by virtue of Section 185(2)(c) these Rules continue to have effect. It is in the present mechanized world when use of energy and machine does involve many situations which are hazardous and pose threat to life and property that law has made the person handling life threatening devices liable. It is this principle that has been termed as Rule of Strict Liability. Near home in the enlightening judgment authored by Justice Rajiv Narain Raina in the case of 'Raman vs. State of Haryana and others', 2013(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 653, the Court held as under :

"24. I think that on failure to use all reasonable means to prevent escape of an inherently dangerous thing, which by nature electricity is, the standard of care will be very high and the onus would be on the supplier to show that there was no negligence. In this case, the respondent-Nigam has not successfully discharged the onus to the satisfaction of this Court." 12.

After going through plethora of judgments dealing on the issue the Court further held as under :

"33. On a reading of the above case law the real question in this case which arises to my mind is whether the supplier of electricity can excuse himself by showing that the escape was owing to the petitioner's default. There is, however, little doubt on the other issues arising out of strict liability; burden of proof of escape of potentially dangerous thing causing injury wittingly



or by surprise; standard of care required from Licensee which is circumspect statutorily under the Act and rules to do certain acts and things in the manner specified; jurisdiction of this court to award compensation in appropriate cases in writ jurisdiction and the connected issue of quantification of compensation so that it is neither under compensation nor overcompensation etc.; that in the present case such factors tilt in favour of the injured and need not detain us. The claim made in the petition is an actionable claim and the case is an eminently fit one for grant of compensation in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution."

13.

Coming to the facts of the present case, so far as ! ! #!!!! !!     "    +  !

  ! 

,, !    

 $B$ $ +!  #   "!  ,,  '

@ 

 $B$ $/:% 1  

 % $ 6)  DDC0'56C.  2      +# $  ##$:    )  

#  $    $      >   $  1 



 /  :  %  %  /  $    +% $   1+%  >+  8;  #+!  )  . 

+ ## 

   8  % $$ >+       $  +        +##    $+   !) $"2#$+

% +   2+  $+#) $

$+ +    !%8+

 +)% $  +  + % $#   "+    !

)2!$>  $  +!##  #!5  #   

   $  +  $  

      1

#  ;

#   " !!! + !!      $# $!  -#!

 !

) B!$+ ) +  " #!

 !

)## $+#!

 !

)+  +##+ +    $ #!

 !!%   9  

# ,    $   #!

 !!%2  +  %)#$#!

$  ))    !+ ! !!

C *    + ! !  '

   !   

     

             6

    

    '      !  ##+ '

< = - )+  $&!   $  <

= -&

+6&!  $ $  .   E"& B%  !#4 ! "& !#$)C -

  '

  !7-& # 

! !! #!

!

 '

@ (%1%&6;;&"1" '&(<=%&1 "0' "! $##) # )!$   # #  :!# #     !##)   $&

 #!

 !!   #)   

      4## %        

! #$ !#!$   %  

 #!

 !##  !   )#)  

/  $  #3       $        #) $  ##)  !   ?!! ##)       ##+    + ! $ 

      #

    $  #!

 !!   !#!!   ''# % !

 # !## !$   # $

- !#  ) ) !!  !

!  !##  !  %&1 "0'"#$ !       #$!$  

  $        $    " E           #   !     !     -!!)   )   

!#$   ! A 0 

##)# ) 

 "& B% * !B%* !  !

"& !#$) )

 



! $00 @(%#&"%4( 16 &0&'%1'  (4'>"1& 16 '"1#' "1142%46". 5(5"002  3& %1'50"1

?100"% %&16 "% @ "11&(%A 5 1 $                 -&!

 -$ 1:

9  $) 

1        !

+ % $ +   ###)#!

 !

)  #) $ +  ! 2 !#   ! #+ #) $!#

   + +% $

+ !) $ ! +    

  

!

 % $ !!+ /!  $   )  ! #   +

    ,     

 ,    #  !

!   ) ,  /1

     +  D "!

  $#)+ % 

   2 #    %+ +#) $  +  $+,!  $ 

   $ $ 6/.

 4 6 !  ! !

+

 + ") )+ $  &

+ $  $ 1      E) E         

!  "& %     !# 4 ! & #! )!

##)E ) +&

+ $ E$$

! #!

!

2 # ! ) "& %

#!

!

!)      ! )#!

!

!  )   " 1 !#)!!#

!      !!    #!

!

  "   '1

 

#) $# #!

 !

) $%+ !

 

#  #

) #)  +! # 

   !

   '  #  J!

)+ ! &  #   +

  !

#  #

)  ) # !  +  +   ##     1

+ #      

9      !

  ! #  %#  #)  1

 #$# $ !!

 + !# 

#) )#  $ > $  1 $  3

! 

  !

# $  $! 

! 

 1" #  )  1  !#!# ! 

    #  #  #) ! 

 !   

 #)#)!  $K6./'

$ 

 !K5 +) #

# # !# ,!

 # K/ * !

#+# +KC5L )&1 'National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and others', (2017) 16 SCC 680 :1

 K66 /'

*#&K6 /'



 + 

#+

! ! 1  ! 

 + #

$

! #! ( !! $#)  +



 ##+ "1'4 .  7 -8 ;1   Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No