Amir Hassan v. State Of Ut Chandigarh And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M No.40220 of 2018 Date of decision : 24.9.2024 Amir Hassan .............Petitioner

Versus

State of UT, Chandigarh and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: None for the petitioner Mr. J.S. Toor, Addl. PP, UT, Chandigarh assisted by Mr. Adhiraj Toor, Advocate, for respondents no.1 to 3 --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Case has been called out twice since morning. None has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

2.

Vide order dated 27.8.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner had sought for and permitted to serve respondent no.4 by way of dasti process. However, office note indicates that none has come present to collect the requisite notice. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant petition.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 24.9.2024 Ashwani Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Ashwani Kumar 2024.09.24 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document