Mandip And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2023:PHHC:053327 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRWP-2215-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:-18.4.2023 Mandip and another ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana.

***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) Today, at the very outset, learned State counsel has informed that while the case of petitioner No.2 - Mahesh @ Shunty for his premature release is under consideration, the case of petitioner No.1 - Mandip had not been initiated as he had not undergone the requisite period of sentence. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as of now petitioner No.1 has also undergone the requisite period of sentence and that some direction may be issued to the authorities concerned to consider his case as well.

In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.04.18 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRWP-2215-2019 (O&M) ( 2 ) 2023:PHHC:053327 petitioners as regards their premature release in accordance with law and as per the policies applicable to them.

It is clarified that the case of petitioner No.1 shall also be processed in accordance with the policy applicable to him in case he is otherwise found eligible.

18.4.2023 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.04.18 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document