Surinder Kumar Makkar v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Sr. No.107 LPA No. 2032 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision : July 11, 2022 Surinder Kumar Makkar ....

Appellant vs.

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and another ....

Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SANDHAWALIA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI.

* * * Present :

Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

* * * G. S. SANDHAWALIA , J.

(Oral) :

Counsel for the appellant submits that since there is provision of appeal against the punishment order, he had challenged the same by filing a separate appeal but unsuccessfully. Thereafter, he has opted to challenge the said order in an independent writ petition. Therefore, counsel for the appellant submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.

Ordered accordingly.

(G. S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE July 11, 2022 (VIKAS SURI) monika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No.

MONIKA 2022.07.12 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document