Jagsir Singh @ Ghunghru v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-56204-2024 Date of decision: 02.12.2024 JAGSIR SINGH @ GHUNGHRU ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Sanchit Choudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana.

***** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1.

In compliance of order dated 12.11.2024 passed by this Court, status report by way of affidavit of Sh.Sanjay Kumar, HPS Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ratia, District Fatehabad has been filed by learned State counsel on behalf of respondent-State in Court today. The same is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. A copy thereof has been furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.

Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer and submissions made by the counsel opposite by drawing the attention of this Court to the allegations levelled in the FIR in question as well as the status report which has been filed in Court today including the Medico Legal Report of the injured which has been annexed along with the status report. Learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioner is the prime accused who was armed with a lethal weapon i.e. Kapa. He inflicted continuous blows and injuries with the Kapa on the head of the injured POONAM RATHORE 2024.12.03 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-56204-2024 -2besides six other grievous injuries on other vital parts on the body of the injured. Learned State counsel has further submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioner prima facie find due corroboration with the medical evidence on record. It has also been brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner is a man of previous criminal antecedents as it is a matter of record that as many as 08 other criminal cases were registered against him previously out of which in some of the cases he already stands convicted for offences under the NDPS Act.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the relevant material placed on record including the status report which has been filed in the Court today.

4.

Prima facie there are specific and serious allegations levelled against the petitioner, who was alleged to be armed with a lethal weapon, and thereafter inflicted multiple injuries on the person of the injured. 5.

In the facts and circumstances as enumerated hereinabove, this Court does not deem it fit to extend the extraordinary concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.

Accordingly, the instant petition is hereby dismissed. However, it is made clear that anything observed hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE December 02, 2024 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2024.12.03 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh