← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/62245/2023disposed of

Sanjeev Mohindra v. State Of Punjab And Others

2023-12-12Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja2 pages

2023:PHHC:158647

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-62245-2023 Date of Decision: December 12, 2023 SANJEEV MOHINDRA ........Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:

Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) 1.

By way of present petition under Section 482 CrPC, a prayer has been made for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to save the petitioner at the instance of respondents No.4 to 7 who are causing harassment by conducting multiple enquiries on application dated 21.02.2022 bearing UID No. 22653655 dated 04.03.2022 (Annexure P-2) submitted by Pooja Trehan against petitioner in civil dispute as matter in question has already been decided vide order dated 06.05.2023 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana (Annexure P-5).

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to decide the representation (Annexure P-9) moved at the instance of petitioner by passing a speaking order expeditiously.

3.

Prayer seems to be justified.

TEJWINDER SINGH 2023.12.13 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-62245-2023 -24.

Upon advance notice, Mr. Shubham Kaushik, A.A.G., Punjab appears on behalf of respondents No.1 to 7 and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 5.

In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4-Deputy Inspector General of Police, NRI Wing, Ludhiana to look into the representation (Annexure P9) and take appropriate action in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of 04 (four) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6.

The aforesaid direction shall not be treated as expression of opinion on the merits of the averments made in the representation 12.12.2023 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2023.12.13 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document