← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/54701/2025dismissed

Sugreev Kumar @ Sugriv Kumar v. State Of Punjab

2025-12-24Ms. Justice Aaradhna Sawhney4 pages



         



!"!

#$ % % 

 

  

 $ &' (% (   ()  * "

$



 

!



 "



 $ "

 

%%%  () 

+ % ,'- & 

'( )&&*

&+,-



! &-.+./& the NDPS Act &+,-

0!

$! '

304

0

 ! *, 1)  Relevant facts as emerging from documents on record be noticed hereinbelow:-  

     

!"!# $        %     &&$%$  "&&'(

')

"

 $$ $%%"



   $ #*+!

!,! -.& 

$   %%$ '$ $

'& $  ' &

 "

 % $')

"

"&$"$ ' $

&%

'& $ '  / ' &'%$$$

%%'

% "

$0" " 

"%1"$

 &2$& &&$ %  

 $ % $% $$  / $ %%$"$ "$&$ 3

41'5+4)

"

$$' %$ '"

')" 4"$+4671 /$ )0"% 1$ 7  8 $&  %  "

  $   %$  &"  %  %       "$  

!$$  /  $  %$     

$$$$(%%$&"

). $ 8 $'8+#. 

"4$ 46& the NDPS Act 

97% 1$ 8:

%$ $ / %$$/$% '%   $$$$ ' 

$ % '!

 3.

Apprehending his arrest, petitioner5

 

0!

5   7  ! '

304





&+-  

 0

* 6 

!0 !

 009 0!

 :

'( :

!



!0   4



00 

0

!  ):5-575,*&



). $95 4

!0 

! incriminating material, is not admissible in evidence 8  

!0 !



!

 

!!!

 2

"



 ;





  0 ! 

 

!0 

.

!0  0  20



!

 ! 6 

!0  !

! 

!  

 9

002





- 9  0  < 

!0 !

9 !

!   ):5-575,*&

). $95 4

!0 09 

!   0  !  ! 

!  





 0 

!4

 !

 !



0

! 6 

!0  !

00 

   

0

4 

;!

 9.



 ;  9 0 5  0 $ 

  9



/

:



  

!



!0



!0 ;

 09



 

!



!0     !

). $ 95 4

!   ):5-575,*&



 0! 9 

 00

9

 00

!0   2   !! 

!0 2 !!0 

9  

  !

0

4

0

!0

!

 0  



9 !! 

0

"



2

0  0 

  !4 '

!

!0

3

0! ! 0

 

 )

2

2

0 4   0

0 

!0

"



20



20

!

 



  !

0 !

! 9 5 !

! < 9 !

!

! = )$ !

 ! '

 

! 

0!

! 9

!  ! 0 0 9

040 

0!   ! ( < 0

! 9

;!



09 

4

;!

 9.



 (

4 2 !

2 !0 <

!0 09 4  !



 !  ! 





0

!09 In view of the discussion made hereinabove, petitioner has failed to make out a case for grant of extraordinary relief of pre-arrest bail. As such, present petition is dismissed.

Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the case9s merits nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments.

, () -

% %

 9 ' "

>   4.  ?@.) >   0 ?@.)