Jatin Garg v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M No. 54464 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 54464 of 2025 Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 Jatin Garg

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Sparsh Chhibber, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

1.

Seeking issuance of appropriate directions to respondents No.1 to 4 to conduct fair, independent and transparent enquiry/investigation against respondents No.5 and 6 and their companion, the petitioner has come up before this Court under Section 528 BNSS, 2023.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent of deciding the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-1) in a time bound manner. 3.

Notice served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

State counsel submits that they would take a decision on the same within a period of three months.

5.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala is directed to decide representation dated 16.08.2025 (Annexure P-1) himself/herself or by delegating the same to any officer holding the rank of IPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the petitioner as well as his counsel on the e-mail ID provided to State counsel during the course of day. Jyoti Sharma 2025.09.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 54464 of 2025 6.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Petitioner and State can download this order and other relevant particulars from the official web page of this court and attest it to be a true copy. 7.

Petition is allowed with the observations mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 25.09.2025 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2025.09.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh