Dayanand v. State Of Haryana
! "
#
$%!&'() *#
$+*,-'((%'
!"
# .*#*/&!" $0 # /&/012 3
!" (20&" '*$*
4 '*&&,0,#
! "
#
$%& '
() *( * (*("
+,%
-
#- . - /
0
0
"
( 1
0 "
#
2 & ***3+
'
4 .
" 5 6
-,6 #
0
+
# "
#
%
. " 7 0 0
#
1 8
Neha 2024.01.19 15:51 I agree to specified portions of this document
$$%&'($) $$
!"#
#
$ %&
'
"() "*
% 7
"
"4
* ( (*(
" 7
"
3 #
% 7
"
"3,
"4
% 7
"
"4 #
(! % % 7
"
"3,
"4
9
7
"
0 % 5 "
0 0 ,
" 4
9
7
"
,9
* (*( '
" 7
7 :
0
" 9 #
7
8 Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Anil Kumar, at the very outset informs the Court that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required.
2),*5&"!&' */ 5/&! .*#*&&// *5 )0!" 67
The petition stands disposed of.
" #
*+*( ' 8**#$09 :93 8**#/& :93 Neha 2024.01.19 15:51 I agree to specified portions of this document