Sukhbeer Singh v. Union Of India And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

 

CWP No.27279 of 2023 Date of Decision:13.12.2023 Sukhbeer Singh ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Talwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rahul Verma, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for Union of India states that passport stands issued to the petitioner, thus, the present petition has rendered infructuous. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes to the statement made by learned counsel for Union of India.

3.

In the wake of statements of both sides, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 13.12.2023 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.12.13 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment