M/S Jhelum Roadways Regd. Amritsar v. Amit Mahajan And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.245 COCP- 3719-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:24.07.2024 M/s Jhelum Roadways Regd. Amritsar Thr. Its Power of Attorney Holder

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Dr. Amit Mahajan and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

Present:

Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG, Punjab RAJBIR SEHRAWAT , J.(ORAL) 1.

This is a contempt petition filed under Section 2(b) read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for punishing the respondents for disobeying the order dated 20.10.2023 passed in CWP24135-2023. 2.

Counsel for the respondents submits that the order dated 20.10.2023 passed in CWP-24135-2023 has been complied with and the costs imposed by this Court, vide order dated 16.01.2024, has already been deposited with Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Clerks Association, Chandigarh. Reply by way of affidavit of Dr. Amit Mahajan, PCS, Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Jalandhar dated 23.07.2024 to that effect, has been produced by the counsel for the respondents in the Court today. The same is taken on record. Registry is directed to scan and tag it at an appropriate place.

DINESH KUMAR 2024.07.25 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side

COCP- 3719-2023 -23.

Counsel for the petitioner has not even disputed the aforesaid fact.

4.

In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed, as such.

5.

However, if any grievance of the petitioner is left unredressed, it would be at liberty to raise the same in any other alternate remedy, but in accordance with law.

( RAJBIR SEHRAWAT ) 24.07.2024 JUDGE dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2024.07.25 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side