Harpreet Singh v. Dilraj Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.244 COCP- 3718-2023 Date of Decision:24.07.2024 Harpreet Singh

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Sh. Dilraj Singh

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

Present:

Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG, Punjab RAJBIR SEHRAWAT , J.(ORAL) 1.

This is a contempt petition filed under Section 2(b) read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for punishing the respondents for disobeying the order dated 28.09.2021 passed in CWP17634-2021. 2.

Counsel for the respondent submits that the order dated 28.09.2021 passed in CWP-17634-2021 has been complied with and the costs imposed by this Court, vide order dated 16.01.2024, has already been deposited with Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Clerks Association, Chandigarh. Copy of communication issued by the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bathinda to that effect, has been produced by the counsel for the respondents in the Court today. The same is taken on record. Registry is directed to scan and tag it at an appropriate place. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner has not even disputed the aforesaid fact.

4.

In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed, as such.

DINESH KUMAR 2024.07.25 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side

COCP- 3718-2023 -25.

However, if any grievance of the petitioner is left unredressed, he would be at liberty to raise the same in any other alternate remedy, but in accordance with law.

( RAJBIR SEHRAWAT ) 24.07.2024 JUDGE dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2024.07.25 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side