Dilip Kumar Sharma And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M-54623-2025 (O&M) - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-54623-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 11.12.2025 DILIP KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS . . . Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR PRESENT: Mr. Ranjeet K. Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG Haryana.

Ms. Dilpreet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of F.I.R. No.1131 dated 23.12.2023, registered under Sections 406, 420, 34 of IPC and Sections 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC added vide order dated 06.11.2025 of IPC, at Police Station Samalkha, District Panipat (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 03.08.2024 (Annexure P-2).

2.

Status report dated 06.12.2025 filed by way of affidavit of Atma Ram, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Panipat filed by respondentState is taken on record. 3.

This Court vide order dated 08.10.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his/her report qua VISHAL VARDHAN 2025.12.11 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-54623-2025 (O&M) - 2 - the genuineness of the compromise.

4.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties had appeared before learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samalkha and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 20.11.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.

5.

Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 6.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R. following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 titled as 'Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another' and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2012) 10 SCC 303 titled as 'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others'. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the F.I.R. No.1131 dated 23.12.2023, registered under Sections 406, 420, 34 of IPC and Sections 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC added vide order dated 06.11.2025 of IPC, at Police Station Samalkha, District Panipat and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise, arrived at between the parties.

11.12.2025 Vishal Vardhan (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No VISHAL VARDHAN 2025.12.11 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document