Rakesh v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M- 55157 of 2019 Date of Decision: 20.12.2019 Rakesh ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal

Present:

Mr. Jitender Malik, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

Petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 45 dated 27.02.2018, registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 & 120B IPC at Police Station Madlauda, District Panipat. As per the prosecution, the petitioner along with co-accused had duped first informant of 5,00,000/- after making false promise of securing ₹ employment for him with a government organization. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is sought to be implicated only because he had given two cheques to coaccused Satender which might have been handed over to the first informant for return of the amount.

This Court has considered the submissions. From the reading of the FIR, it has been averred that in February, 2014 Vakil Ahmad, Rakesh (the petitioner) and Satender had come to the house of the first informant and assured that the petitioner shall get employment in Purvanchan Krishi DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2019.12.20 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M- 55157 of 2019 Vishchan Nigam. The first informant was three times handed forged appointment letters.

In view thereof, the allegations in the petition are serious. Hence, no ground to grant pre-arrest bail is made out. Dismissed.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge December 20, 2019 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2019.12.20 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document