Charanjit Singh v. State Of Punjab
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 17.12.2024 CHARANJIT SINGH ....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.
***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) 1.
In compliance of the order dated 29.11.2024, Sh. Harjinder Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police
By way of present petition filed unde !"
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 # $%& '() *
16.10.2024 109, 127(2), 132, 191(3), 190, 324(4), 324(5), 221, 308(2), 171 of the BNS;
135 of Representation of People Act, 1951 Hathur, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana
-2- !
+ #,
, - ))
.
!
#
/0 ,# ,# + ,
0 + , & % 2 , /0
, 3 + 0
3 + + 0
+ - ))
.
!+
*( Deputy Superintendent of Police !" !
# $ # !
" ! "
# $ $ Deputy Superintendent of Police !$ # %
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Raikot,
! $$ !
!
" & ' #
! ! () ! $ ! # * without commenting on the merits of the case, the petitioner is hereby directed to join investigation within seven days from today and co-
-3operate in the same. In the event of the arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. He shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS.
List on 17/12/2024.
Investigating Officer of the case is also directed to remain present in Court on the next date of hearing along with record."
"
60#0 #,
,#
+ / 0
3 - ))
.
!
# ,# 0 - ))
.
! # + , #/
0 !"
78 $
/0 3 + #+ + # 0#%0 9++ +
:, 0 +
0
,
+ -
;
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 17.12.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No