Gajinder Kumar Hari v. Neelam Sabharwal

RA-CR-105-CII of 2018 in CR No. 921 of 2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-14981-CII-2018 in/and RA-CR-105-CII of 2018 in CR No. 921 of 2018 Date of Decision: 03.08.2018 Gajinder Kumar Hari

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Neelam Sabharwal

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Arshit Goel, Advocate for Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner.

Mr. S.P. Soi, Advocate for the respondent.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) CM-11039-CII-2018 Heard. There is delay of 23 days in filing the review application (RA-CR-105-CII-2018) In view of facts mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 23 days in filing the review application (RA-CR-105CII-2018) is, hereby, condoned. RA-CR-105-CII-2018 (O&M) Applicant-petitioner has filed the instant review application seeking one year time to vacate the demised premises. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that this review application has been rendered infructuous as possession of the demised premises has already been taken.

Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner admits that JITENDER KUMAR 2018.08.06 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

RA-CR-105-CII of 2018 in CR No. 921 of 2018 -2possession of the demised premises has been taken by the respondentlandlord. Revision petition filed by review applicant was dismissed on 02.04.2018 on merit, as such, I find no reason to allow the instant application, which has also been rendered infructuous as possession of the demised premises has already been handed over by review application to respondent-landlord.

Dismissed.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) August 03, 2018 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JITENDER KUMAR 2018.08.06 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh