Jaswant Singh Alias Tatto Alias Tintu And Another v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-55472-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55472-2025 Date of decision: 15.12.2025 Jaswant Singh @ Tattoo @ Tintu and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.99 dated 02.09.2025, registered under Section 52 of Punjab Canal and Drainage Act, 2023 and Section 324(3) of BNS (Sections 125, 351(3) of BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act added later on) at Police Station Bajakhana, District Faridkot. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the order dated 30.09.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required for further investigation of the case.

3.

Learned State counsel, on instruction from assisting police official, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required for the purpose of investigation. 4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5.

Since the petitioners have joined the investigation and their SONIA BURA 2025.12.16 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-55472-2025 custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 30.09.2025 is made absolute. 6.

However, the petitioners shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. December 15, 2025 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SONIA BURA 2025.12.16 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document