Nona Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Others






IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-11844-2023 Date of decision : 08.12.2023 NONA KAUR AND ANR ....Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

4.

As per the petitioners, they have married on 05.12.2023 against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 6, who happen to be the family members/ relatives of petitioner No.1 i.e. Nona Kaur.

5.

Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that petitioner No.1-Nona Kaur is 29.09.1999 born and petitioner No.2-Gurpreet Singh is 02.02.1998 born. 6.

Without commenting on the legality and validity of the Deepak Kumar 2023.12.08 13:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-11844-2023 -22023:PHHC:156990 marriage, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Mansa, District Mansa) to look into the representation dated 05.12.2023 (Annexure P-5) submitted by the petitioners.

7.

Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married, I think that if possible, respondent No.2 may call a meeting of the petitioners as well as respondents No.4 to 6 in his presence, so that the parties get rid off their ill feelings and live amicably. 8.

The petition stands disposed off.

December 08, 2023 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Deepak Kumar 2023.12.08 13:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document