Amit Kumar v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-55902-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:-30.10.2019 Amit Kumar ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Vijay Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Rashmi Attri, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, assisted by HC Mandeep Singh.

Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions from his client.

At the last date of hearing, this Court while noticing that respondent No.2-Neeta Rani had appeared in person but the petitioner had chosen not to appear and while also noticing that the petitioner, despite having been directed to appear before the District Judge at Patiala on 26.7.2019, had not turned up on the said date, had directed the petitioner to pay an amount of `10,000/- to respondent No.2-Neeta Rani However, since neither the said amount has been paid and nor the counsel for the petitioner has any instructions in the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

30.10.2019 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2019.10.30 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document