Rinku v. State Of Haryana

2023:PHHC:064806 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-399-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-5.5.2023 Rinku ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the complainant. ***** FIR No.

Dated Police Station Section/s 4.9.2015 Assandh, District Karnal 323, 354, 406, 498-A of Indian Penal Code GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in respect of the abovementioned FIR.

2.

The matter basically arises out of a matrimonial dispute leading to initiation of several litigations. On the last date of hearing, both the learned counsel had expressed that there could be some chances of an amicable settlement and with their able assistance as well as the assistance of Mediation and PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.05.05 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-399-2020 (O&M) ( 2 ) 2023:PHHC:064806 Conciliation Center of this Court, the matter has been amicably resolved. A copy of settlement/agreement dated 1.5.2023 is on record. 3.

Having regard to the fact that the parties have resolved their matrimonial dispute by way of settlement/agreement dated 1.5.2023 and that both the learned counsel do not have any objection for disposal of the instant petition, it will be in the fitness of things that the instant petition be accepted particularly since the matter arises out of a matrimonial discord amongst the parties, which stands resolved.

4.

The instant petition, as such, is allowed and the interim directions issued by this Court vide orders 20.1.2020/12.2.2020 are hereby made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 5.

It is further clarified that since the amount of Rs.10 lakhs had been invested in FDR pursuant to order dated 30.11.2022 passed by this Court, it shall be open to the petitioner to operate such account/FDR and to get the amount released from the same.

6.

Needless to mention, the parties shall be bound by all such terms and conditions as stipulated in settlement/agreement dated 1.5.2023 and shall withdraw the litigations as may be pending between them. 5.5.2023 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.05.05 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document