← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/62449/2023allowed

Inderjeet Kaur v. State Of Punjab

2024-01-10Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry2 pages

N.C. No.2024:PHHC:003016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-62449-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.01.2024 INDERJEET KAUR ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :

Mr. Vinay Puri, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sarabjit Singh Cheema, DAG Punjab.

Mr. V.P.S. Mathur, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SANJIV BERRY. J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under:

FIR No.

Dated Sections Police Station 24.11.2023 406, 420, 120-B IPC Nurpur Bedi, District Rupnagar 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in compliance to the order dated 12.12.2023 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation and as such interim bail granted to the petitioner may be confirmed.

3.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Malkiat Singh has intimated that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no more required for any custodial investigation in this case nor she is required for further investigation. 4.

Learned counsel for the complainant opposes the bail and submits that the petitioner is not entitled to the concession of bail considering the gravity of offence.

SANDAL SHARMA 2024.01.12 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

N.C. No.2024:PHHC:003016 CRM-M-62449-2023 (O&M) -25.

Heard.

6.

Keeping in view the above submissions made by learned State counsel and the fact that the petitioner had joined the investigation consequent to the order dated 12.12.2023 passed by this Court, interim bail granted vide order dated 12.12.2023 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Further the petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required in future by way of written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case upon the petitioner; she will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

7.

The petition stands allowed.

(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 10.01.2024 S.Sharma(syr) Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/ No SANDAL SHARMA 2024.01.12 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment