Anup Nagar @ Anoop Kumar v. State Of Haryana





    
     

  !" #$%$!&'(( &)* + ,-&!!*.)/ ,  (((( $$!& , 0 ,%)%  !" ,2 &

((((( %*!&3 &
    

 
 

, % &'

,( $ %5!/ ,637!#  6 "!,5 * $$!& ,( ,(/,$8 ,9 :66 ,2 &


 



!"# 1.

On 30.09.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been attributed injury on the hand. The incident between complainant and co-accused Vikesh Nagar, who is nephew of the petitioner and enlarged on bail, took place in the market whereafter the complainant had come to the house of the petitioner and he tried to de-escalate the matter. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate.

Notice of motion.

At the asking of the Court, Mr. BS Saroha, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.

Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 09.10.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS.

However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated.

Adjourned to 27.11.2025.;

2.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

3.

Learned State counsel on instructions affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 4.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 30.09.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (now 482(2) of BNSS, 2023)

$ 5.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.  
 

    % &'()*(!

     3$& %5 <5 5 ,%* 8$&+ '

 %=!

<5 5 ,, *!, >:

'

 %=!