Vijay Kumar v. State Of Punjab

On 17.10.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel 05 days in lodging the FIR co-accused was granted ba 4). He refers to the FIR witnesses namely Kushal also came at the spot whe taken place who have 06.10.2025 and 23.09.202 and P-6 respectively, that t recorded as witnesses by some papers on pretext Manpreet Kaur-complain involved in any other cas join the investigation as investigating agency and w submits that there is a delay of R and on this ground itself the ail on 16.09.2025 (Annexure Pto state that there were two Chand and Shashi Pal, who en the alleged occurrence had sworn their affidavits dated 25, annexed as Annexures P-5 their names have wrongly been obtaining their signatures on of identification purpose of nant. The appellant is not se and is ready and willing to and when required by the will cooperate.

In the circumstance join the investigation on event of his arrest, he shal the satisfaction of the Arre es, the appellant is directed to or before 30.10.2025. In the l be released on interim bail to sting Officer, subject to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.10 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) Cr.P.C.

However, it is clarified that if the appellant does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 10.12.2025."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the appellant has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the appellant to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from DSP Jashandeep Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the appellant and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the appellant is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the appellant is allowed and the order dated 17.10.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the appellant fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.10 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.