Manjeet Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-11280-2024 Date of decision: 22.11.2024 MANJEET KAUR AND ANR ....Petitioners V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. R.K. Agnihotri, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 6, who are stated to be family members of petitioner No.1.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1, aged about 25 years and petitioner No.2, aged about 26 years, got married on 15.11.2024 against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 6. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation/complaint dated 16.11.2024 (Annexure P-5) was also made to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, District Fazilka wherein a mention has been made about the alleged threat perception. Learned counsel submits that despite the official respondents having been communicated about the POONAM RATHORE 2024.11.22 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRWP-11280-2024 -2alleged threat perception, no steps have been taken to come to the rescue of the petitioners. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, District Fazilka to look into their representation/complaint dated 16.11.2024 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

On asking of the Court, Mr. Navdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, District Fazilka to look into the representation/complaint dated 16.11.2024 (Annexure P-5) qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.

(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE November 22, 2024 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2024.11.22 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh