Rakesh Kumar v. State Of Punjab

   
      
  

!"#"

$%

&&



&&&& ""

$ '

 

  &&&& #( $) $
% *+ ,& ,
 ,  ' # $%      
  

 !  """""

 $"#-  '

. &/'

# $ %   &'() * +% 

 (,(-.  /0)+

12  * 34
+(('#5#,(,(&  &,6 47 %  7* %

   %

 ( )    

    34
 % %  

%*

/8 9%%  % % %%#&:%    ,;,6(,(#  % %    %% 

% %%#(, % $    * %

 % % *  

*#:,5(,(# <  

  % 



=   $  

%   
6#(;6,>/*,:,;(,((  %  *  $  ?      % 34
 %  *

%

  

 *   

    %  * 7   9 %

%

     ,:##(,(& - 4     %   *               

*

   *  %<  

* ** % *  *%% + *     

% ?  +

  

*%  *   %



 & +   : @    

    

 %  *  +(/

 6 @                    +(>

 * %     

   <   

 

    $



  %   %

%  #5&/ 47  % $    % = *< 

 %      *  <    

%   ?        %

  % *  A  =   *    % 

   

%  =

         %    *   

   #-'    +%  4

     #''# 
   ?       %* *  %4   %    

*   %  

    B        % 



= * 5 4                %  

      ' $ %  



% >%%% 

=% %%  *   %    %   %   
6 @   

   

   



 %74 /+7$/ 5#5/(,((74 /+7$/&&'/(,((     

  

$   *     

   The powers of anticipatory bail are extra ordinary and the same are to be exercised sparingly in exceptional circumstances. The judicial discretion conferred upon the Court has to be properly exercised after application of mind as to the nature and gravity of the accusation, possibility of applicant fleeing from justice and other factors to decide whether it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail as such grant to some extent interferes in the sphere of investigation of an offence. In the

 present case, no exceptional circumstances warranting exercise of the powers for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court are existing. F

 %  % % t 

%   ?  As such, I am of the considered opinion that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. 9.

It is clarified that observations made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. /, 1

&&

   B  %>  C 8>+ B 
  8>+