Najir Ali v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-29887-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.11.2025 Najir Ali ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER

Present:

Mr. Mohammad Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner.

***** HARSH BUNGER J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing respondents No.2 to 8 to ensure that the sanctioned work under the Shivdham Scheme (i.e. construction of boundary wall around the Kabristan) with a sanctioned grant of Rs.35,00,000/- is executed forthwith and without obstruction.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the concerned authorities to decide representation dated 20.08.2025 (Annexure P-7) submitted by the petitioner, in a time bound manner. 3.

On advance service of copy of petition, , appears on behalf of the respondent(s)-State. 4.

Learned State counsel submits that in case, the representation dated 20.08.2025 (Annexure P-7) has been received in the office of HIMANI GUPTA 2025.11.06 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

respondent No.2 (Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal), then the concerned authorities shall take decision either way on the same, within a period of three months from today, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties and by way of passing a speaking order. 5.

Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, the present writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 6.

All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 03.11.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE

1. Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No

2. Whether reportable :

Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2025.11.06 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document