Gurjeet Singh Johar v. State Of Punjab And Another
IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH )*+, ,- 1 0 2/ $$ )*
$$$
.
/ / /
0
$$$ /30
/
'
!"#$%&'# '
!
& Ms. Prachi Darji, Advocate fo Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. or e
!
& ($
*# $#+!
!
$ , +, + " (
("# $.!/ "-#!
* 0 1"
" +! (
!"
" % # !#! # "# #$" %&" ! # ! $'
* # # $ # $ !
! #
$# #!!# +!!# & % #" ! & %
%$ 2% % $ %% &
+* ! ! # #'" :## 7, /, " 3"+ + + "%!! !#$ # 0)"+!( "4 "5$5
" 6&"/ -"4"/"6 6"#!&$ 7
)(
1 # $ " !# % & ! #&!! # #
! #! # % %###!# #! +!
5 $ ## 8 #! 5!" #
& ! # ! & #!! : & ! ! # &##
$ #!+!
!
# !#! #" ! # #
(& % ! #!
* ! 8 5 ! !$ ! # ! #! !+ +! !
4 # !#2 * & ! #
, ,.+ 7885 79 9)$*
!"# $%&' ( '
'))* + , -
,./ $%%& 0!12 3$ 45'* 66 6
,.
$%)% 57)*,; !
, .2 7878073# #0 3''%*+ 1,
, , .(1 0(2378$9053#
# 0: 3$))*!
;
, , . 2 78$' 0&3 #
# 0 3 998* ( 6
,.< $%4' $')5* +
, $ $%95
%)9 9*- +1
,./ / *$%%& $ $45' (,
, $%99 '$5 #!!% !# ; # $ " &
)3
("! % #% % !&
!, &" ! #! )0
: )0
(" ! #!
)3
(% !&" !#! )(
("%! # %$ 1$> !##! 5!" % ! & #& +! < = "# %!"#! () $ & !!# !#! %!$ -! !
* riLJ
#! #Gurappa Gugal and other rs Vs. State of Mysore : 1969 Cr 826 and Sh hokat Ali Vs. State of Haryna :
2020(2) RCR (Criminal) 339.
?!%,# )(
("#! % !&
!,'! 5%&"! $#()$ # " ! % 8
( % ##! # However r, while adjourning the case e to 23.08.2023 3, the learned trial Court failed t to consider the fact that ! &' $#$8 !#! % # !# %!# ! #! #! # % () $ -! !'! + + 1,
,.( 1 0(23 7 78$9053#
# 0: 3$)) / /"#! & 2%% !! # 5!" ! $ # #! &!# !!$"&% ! & &% %% &!"# # %#
("# .!/ "-#!
* 0
1"
" +! (
!"%
$# ! #! #" % ! #!
5%&"# ! !! % # % ," 8! !# $ "$## +!9 ++ !$ !#$ ! " # 8! ! $ 8! $
# $!! !
!!!%%
&!
!$##! !!
"!!
#'# $ '# $ # # ! !!#
* ##! # "
" $
!! ### %#% ,$"#
* # $ ##!
! ### , # '# # ##! ##& !! $$)* * (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No