Harwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
2
IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH 113+252 ++ -.
.3/
++,
51 +%%+
%%% 0 11
%%%16 1
)
!"#$ % &'()$ )
( Mr.
&'$()* + ,$())- -(%& + .*,$()* /#
( * &%
+ +,++, )0 '%#1
++ ./ 2 %,
3%$
7)8%
:( %4%+ +$(4
($% %
"($ %, 6 (
"( 9 (
9(
!
" 5 , *5(4(0 # #
2 $% $% %
+
# # ;
; "
6 )% #% $ #
;00% $# ; 0 )% # #$ $ # %# # ; 0 * * * 0 /%##/0 0 % % + ( #0 % 0$ % %, ;
; & % $ ; ( %$ #%$ $
, , =, , %( % /#( $% #$ #%$ $ # 0%$0 # % ( %( %$ #
*% $ * $%$# < $*$ % % *% %# $$%,
$ $## # ( ( # #%$
%##$ 3%0 0 3%$$ #
)$$%$# 0 > ># %(*
"6
( 0 %$0 0 * 1 %*( % % # $#
)% 0 %$ $%# 0 $#0 (*%%( 8% ( $ ( 0 0 * * , : $ %Rohi 008 Crl. J. 2561. it Kumar Vs. State of Delhi : 20 !
) % * # 0 %
"9
?
? 0 1 % "9
( # 0 * * 8% ;0*( # " 0 &%
<%# *$( * #08% "
(3%$ $ % %"9
(0 # 0 $ # " % % ;(#0 * * , : ( 0 ( # " 3%$*% % # %$%# 0# %
$% Gurappa Gugal and others Vs.
State of M Mysore : 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali Vs. State of Haryn na :
2020(2) R RCR (Criminal) 339. % , while adjourning the case e to 15.02.2024 4 to complete the mandatory p period of 30 days, the learned trial Court faile ed to consider the fact that %*8# # &%$ # 0 3% % 0 % % # $0 " 8 #
!
" #$% & &'
%(% #*$ * #0 *#%% 0 *$0 0%$ ) , 7 : % (# % #%% 0*$0 % @ # 8 # %% %%# 0% #%%% %0*$ #8 #%% % % 2% %7: 7:
:, 7 :7:
&% *&%*(0 #0%* * % #% #% * $ %Pawan Kumar Gupta a Vs.
of W.B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368. The State )$(*0 %#* *0 00 *%( 0#%$
7)8% 9:(
,
%4%+ $(4$ ( ($% %
6""6
"( $ % , ( ( , ; %( ' =% %( 0 # ( (3%03% $$# #
A$*0 & % $00%*% % ( % %0 "
01# #$( %# # (%& %$ /%
2 %( #
# %0% #(# # # #
;0*( %& #
"("""
"/ ( 0'=$,* * )%( =% , (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE +%%++,
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No