Rahul Malik v. State Of Haryana

[213]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF P

PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH AT CHANDIGA CRM-M- -58365-2024 (O&M) Decision : 27.11.2024 Date of D alik Rahul Ma State of H Coram :

Present:

...Petitioner

versus Haryana ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate fo Mr. Sandeep Singh Mann, Ad *** or the petitioner.

ddl. AG, Haryana.

PANKAJ [1] J JAIN, J. (ORAL) After arguing for some time, , counsel for the petitioner subm mits that the pe etition may be dismissed as not p pressed at this stage.

[2] Dismissed as not pressed.

[3] However, counsel for the petitioner prays that the trial be expedited d.

[4] Keeping in view that the inc carceration of the petitioner is m more than 01 ye ear, the learned Trial Court is dir rected to expedite the trial.

[5] Ordered accordingly.

(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 27.11.202 'R. Sharma'

:

Yes/No :

Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.11.28 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable