High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/7565/2023disposed of

Vinod Kumar Gupta v. Neelam Jindal

2024-07-25Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-7565-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.07.2024 Vinod Kumar Gupta ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Neelam Jindal ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Goel, Advocate for the respondent.

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1.

After arguing for some time and on realizing that this Court is not agreeing with the arguments raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel on instructions from the petitioner states that since the petitioner is running a business of hosiery and readymade goods in the premises, he be granted some reasonable time to vacate the premises. 2.

The learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that no rent has been paid after 2018 and that the current market rent is Rs.25,000/- to Rs.30,000/- per month. The learned counsel for the respondent states that he has instructions that the respondent would have no objection if some time is granted to the petitioner to vacate the premises in case some reasonable amount is fixed as mesne profits for the use and occupation of the premises Yogesh Sharma 2024.07.26 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

High Court Chandigarh

CR-7565-2023 (O&M) -2for the period which is being granted to the petitioner for vacation of the premises.

In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is granted 09 months' time to vacate the premises i.e. on or before 30.04.2025 on the condition that all arrears of rent @ Rs.500/- per month, which is the agreed rate of rent, shall be cleared from 2018 till 31.07.2024. Further, from 01.08.2024, the petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs.15,000/- per month by the 7th of every month towards use and occupation of the premises till the time vacant possession is handed over to the landlordrespondent i.e. on or before 30.04.2025. The counsel for the parties are agreeable to the above terms. Let an undertaking be filed by the petitioner before the concerned Rent Controller in terms of the order passed today within a period of 15 days from today. It is made clear that in case the undertaking is not filed as directed the present revision would be deemed to having been dismissed and the respondent would be at liberty to get the orders of the Authorities executed in accordance with law. 4.

Disposed off accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

25.07.2024 Yogesh Sharma ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Yogesh Sharma 2024.07.26 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

High Court Chandigarh